The French Connection Educational Courses
to help you earn your Masters in Deception
The Deception Dollar
Deception for who?
6 Jan 2006
Dollar has two primary effects on people.
The only way you will understand these accusations is to look at the web sites on the Deception Dollar yourself, and then compare the information at those sites to the information at such sites as:
Don't make excuses for the people who produced the Deception Dollar. Don't assume that they are naive. They know what they're doing.
There had been eight printings of the Deception Dollar as of January 2006, so they have had eight attempts to find useful sites. However, they continue to include web sites of little value, or sites that are truly deceptive.
Further evidence that these people are deceptive is the video they produced, the cover of which is shown below.
|Their DVD implies that the Bush family is responsible for terrorism.
Specifically, that Hitler, Saddam Hussein, and Osama bin Laden are actually
puppets of the Bush family.
What evidence is there that the Bush family is in control of Hitler, Hussein, and bin Laden? And how is the Bush family stopping NBC, the New York Times, CBS, and other television networks, magazines, and newspapers around the world from exposing their crimes?
How could the people who produce this DVD and these Deception Dollars possibly believe that the Bush family has as much control over the world?
The only sensible answer is that these people do not really believe that Bush is in control of the world. Rather, they are trying to deceive us.
During the 2004 elections, these people were little more then that a Kerry-for-President committee.
A more accurate DVD would have the following cover:
|Most of the people involved in that Deception Dollar and that deceptive
DVD are in the San Francisco area. They are the same group of people that
invited Eric Hufschmid to speak in March of 2004 at a meeting about September
11, and then about a week later, would not let him speak.
Although they did not feel that Hufschmid was acceptable as a speaker,
take a serious look at who they allowed to speak. The list is at
Here are some of the people they considered qualified to speak about
Actually, they let Ruppert speak twice at this meeting.
They let Jim Hoffman speak about the collapse of the World Trade Center towers, and at that time Hoffman was promoting the theory that the towers may have been taken down by Maser weapons.
Paul Thompson discussed "The Role of Pakistan in 9-11 and Possible US Government Connections There is ample evidence that the Pakistani intelligence agency, the ISI, played a key role in the 9-11 plot."
Webster Tarpley discussed "The question of the links between the Bush family and the Nazis."
Hopsicker may have some good information about the flight schools in Florida, but he tries to promote the nonsense that the towers and Building 7 fell down because of fires.
Antony Sutton wrote about the Skull And Bones society of Yale University. He died in 2002. We could describe Kris Millegan as Sutton's replacement since Millegan is now writing about this society. However, Millegan may simply be trying to get control of the issue, not expose it.
He was the lawyer for Ellen Mariani, whose husband supposedly died during the 9-11 attack. Berg claimed to be filing a lawsuit against the government. He has been involved in 9-11 for years, but what has he accomplished? How is he making a living?
The Guerrilla News Network did not speak, rather, they played their video Aftermath.