The French Connection Educational Courses
to help you earn your Masters in Deception
What are "Handlers"?
updated 6 Feb 2006
To understand the issue of "handlers", let's first look at some curious
coincidences in regards to woman named Deborah Simon.
Deborah Simon discovered the mysterious bomb (or pod) that was attached to the bottom of the airplane that crashed into the South Tower. Here is how Phil Jayhan described her discovery on his message board:
Is it be a coincidence that Phil Jayhan posted a few hours after Deborah Simon? Or did Simon call Jayhan and tell him, "Phil, Simon says, post at lies.com!"
Karl Schwarz not only praises Deborah Simon, but he also made her part of his 2008 presidential campaign team. Here is how Schwarz describes her:
An article at Tom Flocco's site describes Deborah Simon as one of his 9-11 researchers, and that she is knowledgeable about an issue most of us have never heard about, namely the "moser" issue:
At the very bottom of that article is the remark:
It appears as if Deborah Simon is very important to Tom Flocco, as far as research goes.
John Kaminski has suggested to some people that they contact Deborah Simon. Why would Kaminski promote her? How did Kaminsky even get to know her? What has Deborah Simon done or said that would justify being promoted by anybody?
The French Connection does not discuss rumors, but in this case the rumors could be so significant that we could not resist mentioning that we heard a rumor that Dylan Avery — the young man who created the video "Loose Change" — was taken to lunch (or dinner.. we forget which) with Schwarz and Simon while they were all in Washington, DC.
Simon seems to be associated with a lot of men with financial problems, emotional problems, and/or frustrations with women:
It appears that Deborah Simon is what we call a handler.
This is a person who takes advantage of emotionally disturbed, naive, and/or
stupid people. A handler tries to manipulate the opinions of their "Useful
Idiots". A handler may use persuasion, threats, money, or sexual services.
Why has Daryl Bradford Smith
People who speak in public have to be careful about what they say, and how they say it. For example, if I accidentally use the word "girl" or "boy" when referring to an adult, some people will assume I did it on purpose to insult them.
My situation is much worse than most people because I am standing up to the September 11 attack, the bombing of the USS Liberty, the control over the media, and Zionism.
I can see people on message boards trying desperately to discredit me. They are looking for something to complain about. So far they have only been able to fabricate insults, such as claiming that my wife supports me financially.
However, if one of my radio guests says something that could be interpreted as a hate crime, then my critics could accuse me of deliberately using my radio show to spread hatred.
In December 2005 I was talking to John Kaminski on the phone, and I asked if I could interview him on my show once again. He agreed to do it.
Kaminski knows how I feel
Kaminski was well aware of how careful we have to be on the radio. In fact, a month before the interview, he told me that he turned down a meeting with a publisher in Europe because he was worried the publisher was actually trying to lure him to Europe so that he could be arrested for hate crimes.
As far as I know, Kaminski has not actually done anything that would justify arresting him for hate crimes, but he was worried that the Zionists would arrest him anyway. Judging by the arrest of people such as Ernst Zundel, the Zionists don't need a valid reason to arrest people. The legal system in Europe and North America are obviously under the control of the Zionists.
There were several private phone calls in which I told him that I live in a hate-crimes country. The issue of Ernst Zundel came up, and I was very clear that I must be careful about what I say. I also told him that I don't want to alienate my Jewish friends.
Kaminski is well aware that is acceptable to publicly discuss crimes by Jewish criminals, but it is irrational to make an accusation that every Jew is involved in these crimes simply because some passages in the Old Testament.
Such an absurd accusation could be considered a hate crime because it is as ridiculous as claiming that every Mormon is involved with, or support, polygamy simply because some Mormon documents support polygamy.
The day before the radio interview we were talking on the phone. Once
the subject of hate crimes came up. However, much to my amazement, during
my radio show Kaminski mentioned that virtually every Jew was complicit
in Zionism and corruption! Why would this man say such things?
Did my punishment fit the crime?
Some people have told me my treatment of Kaminski was "harsh", and I agree that I may have slapped Kaminski a bit harder than I should have. However, the French Connection will not provide David Duke or Michael Savage type programming, i.e., programming that uses hateful or irrational statements.
For example, one of Kaminski's remarks was:
"I urge everyone to read the Talmud and see that the jews have always hated, HATED, everyone else throughout history. That's how they keep themselves together. They keep themselves together with hate, which is why all these new hate laws are the ultimate in hypocrisy..."
What would you think if Kaminski made a statement like this:
Republicans have always hated, HATED, the Democrats. That's how they keep themselves together. They keep themselves together with hate, which is why all these new hate laws are the ultimate in hypocrisy.
Brunettes have always hated, HATED, the Blondes. That's how they keep themselves together. They keep themselves together with hate, which is why all these new hate laws are the ultimate in hypocrisy.
Why does Kaminsky support nonsensical sites?
Furthermore, part of my annoyance with Kaminski is due to the company he keeps. I suggested to Kaminski that he stop posting articles on web sites that promote crop circles and Martians because those sites make researchers of Zionism and the 9-11 attack appear to be lunatics. I explained to Kaminski that we need to drive those UFO sites out of business, not support them.
However, Kaminski refused to terminate his relationship with any site,
no matter how idiotic the site may seem.
Why did Kaminski date Judy Andreas?
When a man who insults all Jews for being evil gets involved with a Jewish woman, we ought to wonder what is going on. Furthermore, Kaminski lives in Florida, and Andreas lives in New York, so they had to spend considerable time and money traveling to be with each other.
To top if off, I am shocked by the hypocrisy of a person who condemns all Jews but who will date a Jew and promote Deborah Simon.
I urge people to raise their standards; to terminate support for people
who behave in irrational ways.
Please tell me I am wrong, John
I grew up knowing and respecting John Kaminski's uncle, so it hurts me deeply to condemn John. So please, John, I would love to say I am wrong about you.
John, please explain your irrational remarks, and your relationship
with Deborah Simon and Judy Andreas. And give me a good reason for your
support for the deceptive web sites that promote UFOs and another nonsensical
topics. Also, tell us who is providing you with financial support.
Secret donations are dangerous
In politics it is very common for a few very wealthy people to give large donations to a political candidate, but they expect a favor in return.
This is common knowledge, and as a result, political candidates, nonprofit organizations, and other people who accept donations should be required to let everybody know who is providing the large donations.
I ask for a few hundred dollars a month only to cover my phone bills. Part of the reason I do not want large amounts of money is because I do not want anyone trying to bribe me.
The Free Republic web site (www.freerepublic.com) asks for donations four times a year. Their most recent donation campaign asked for more than $60,000. They are bringing in more then $240,000 a year at this rate. Who is providing them with this much money?
John Kaminski claims to receive thousands of dollars of donations per year, which is a lot of money considering his audience is perhaps 20,000 to 30,000 people. Is he receiving thousands of small donations? Or is he getting a few very large donations?
Many people are aware that large donations are contaminating politics,
but few people wonder if donations are also contaminating Internet web
sites, independent authors, and 9/11 researchers.
Let's practice what we preach
When will the 911 truth movement start applying the same standards to themselves that they expect political candidates to follow? If we expect candidates to be honest with their donations, why can't we expect the 9/11 groups to be honest about their funding?
We want political candidates to be honest about their sources of funding, so why not demand honesty in regards to the funding for the 9/11 and other "truth" groups?
Where is the MoveOn organization getting its money? How about www.911truth.org?
Let's have some honesty in the 9-11 movement, ladies and gentlemen.