you criticize Republicans for giving blind obedience to President Bush?
Do you criticize the Russians for following Joseph Stalin, or the French
for following Napoleon? Do you make remarks such as, "Why
did millions of Germans follow Adolf Hitler?"
If so, are you better than the people you insult? Specifically, are
you willing to look critically at the people in the 911 'truth movement"?
Or do you make excuses for their suspicious behavior with such remarks
• "Oh, Alex Jones just has an ego problem."
• "Phil Jayhan is just a bit psychotic."
• "Webster Tarpley, Kurt Nimmo, Dylan Avery, Dave
von Kleist, and 911truth.org just haven't figured out what is going on
• "Well, I think Jeff Rense really believes in
UFOs; I don't think he is trying to deceive us."
If you make such excuses, you are behaving like the people you criticize!
We have the right and the responsibility
to investigate the 9-11 investigators and give ourselves respectable leadership:
Don't make excuses for psychotic or suspicious behavior. If the 9/11
"truth seekers" don't like being criticized, they can behave in a more
respectable manner, or they can find some other activity.
9/11 hoax is collapsing, but it is because of newcomers such as Hufschmid,
Smith, and you, not the people who
have been around for decades, such
as Webster Tarpley, Alex Jones, and Jeff Rense.
The 9-11 movement needs leaders who are respectable, not goofballs that
we feel sorry for. We will not convince people to listen to us when they
see Jeff Rense, Alex Jones, and Greg Szymanski promoting idiotic and vague
theories. Have you seen our view of this issue: