Hello,
I have some valuable information proving that the reason some Jews give for discrediting the Protocols is a lie. The common claim is that they are a forgery of a book, "Dialogues aux Enfers entre Machiavelli et Montesquieu" (Talks of the Hell between Macchiavelli and Montesquieu), written by Maurice Joly, originally published in Geneva in 1864, then in Brussels in 1865. While it's true that this has some text in it mirroring the Protocols, it is not the first such work. There was an earlier book, "Macchiavelli, Montesquieu and Rousseau", published by Jacob Venedey in 1850 that also has text mirrored in the Protocols, with the same theme and spirit. However, the Jews who ignore this have a reason: Venedey was Jewish and a close personal friend and associate of Karl Marx. He got himself kicked out of Berlin and Breslau, was an active Freemason, affiliated with the Carbonari, and associated with the same socialist movement as Maurice Joly. Now, isn't that something? The London Times, on August 16, 17, 18, 1921, printed an article by Phillip Graves, whose name was not revealed at the time, "exposing" the Protocols as a fraud by citing Macchiavelli and Montesquieu (Joly), which the Times called, "The Geneva Dialogues". Graves claimed to have met with a Russian landowner with English connections in Constantinople, and this anonymous landowner obtained a copy from an anonymous Okhrana officer - a member of the Russian secret police, and it was from this work that they forged the Protocols. How convenient for world Jewry that no one will ever know this ex-police officer's name to check his story. Let me point out that at the time the Bolsheviks were consolidating their control over Russia, so he could not have claimed to be in fear of letting this information out. It's quite simple. The London Times' article is a fraud that was reprinted and sold in a 24 page document for one shilling. It was entitled, "The Truth about The Protocols". Where have we heard that before? You can find this information in Part II, Chapter III of "Waters Flowing Eastward", by L. Fry (pages 92-97). I hope you find this useful, J. New York |
|||||
|